Palo Duro Baptist Church, Bushland Air Quality Forecast - Today, Tomorrow
Air Quality Today
Today (6 October): Air quality in Palo Duro Baptist Church is poor. AQI and NO2 are poor; PM2.5 and PM10 are moderate; O3 is fair; SO2, CO, HCHO, and PM1 are good. Pollution peaks around 4:00 PM (NO2: 66.9/100).
Air Quality Tomorrow
Tomorrow (7 October 2026): Air quality in Palo Duro Baptist Church is poor. All pollutants stay as today. Pollution peaks around 4:00 PM (NO2: 77.5/100).
Explore Forecasts
Air Quality
Today - 6 October
| Pollen species | Level | Value |
|---|---|---|
| AQI | Poor | 66.9/100 |
| PM2.5 (fine particles) | Moderate | 46.1/100 |
| PM10 (coarse particles) | Moderate | 50.9/100 |
| NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) | Poor | 66.9/100 |
| O3 (ozone) | Fair | 24.5/100 |
| SO2 (sulfur dioxide) | Good | 5.1/100 |
| CO (carbon monoxide) | Good | 0.6/100 |
| HCHO (formaldehyde) | Good | 4.0/100 |
| PM1 (ultrafine particles) | Good | 18.6/100 |
Tomorrow - 7 October
| Pollen species | Level | Value |
|---|---|---|
| AQI | Poor | 77.5/100 |
| PM2.5 (fine particles) | Moderate | 44.0/100 |
| PM10 (coarse particles) | Moderate | 50.4/100 |
| NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) | Poor | 77.5/100 |
| O3 (ozone) | Fair | 27.2/100 |
| SO2 (sulfur dioxide) | Good | 3.7/100 |
| CO (carbon monoxide) | Good | 0.6/100 |
| HCHO (formaldehyde) | Good | 2.6/100 |
| PM1 (ultrafine particles) | Good | 16.5/100 |
Local Environmental Conditions
Around this part of Bushland, traffic is light and there are few concentrated sources of air pollution. Surrounding farmland adds dust from plowing and harvesting, ammonia from fertilizer and livestock, and smoke when crop residues are burned. Pollution carried in from the wider region can also raise levels at times.
Particle levels tend to be highest from December to February, when wood burning and traffic add more emissions and cold, calm spells at around 2°C slow their dispersal. Ozone is the main concern from May to September, when sunny days averaging 28°C turn traffic and other emissions into ozone by mid-afternoon. Field work, harvest and any burning of crop residues add bursts of dust and smoke in the farming season.
Get pollen & AQ on Strava
Follow your environmental exposure and performance with the free Airmine-Strava integration. See your pollen and air quality exposure for every Strava activity.
Resource Hub
Air quality forecast neighborhoods 6 neighborhoods
Frequently Asked Questions About Air Quality in Texas
Is air quality bad in Palo Duro Baptist Church right now?
On 6 October 2026, overall air quality in Palo Duro Baptist Church is poor. AQI is the main air quality indicator at 66.9/100. Pollution peaks around 4:00 PM (NO2: 66.9/100).
Will air quality be worse tomorrow in Palo Duro Baptist Church?
On 7 October 2026, air quality conditions in Palo Duro Baptist Church will be similar to today, with AQI forecast at poor at 77.5/100. Pollution peaks around 4:00 PM (NO2: 77.5/100).
When is air pollution at its worst in Palo Duro Baptist Church?
Particle levels tend to be highest from December to February, when wood burning and traffic add more emissions and cold, calm spells at around 2°C slow their dispersal. Ozone is the main concern from May to September, when sunny days averaging 28°C turn traffic and other emissions into ozone by mid-afternoon. Field work, harvest and any burning of crop residues add bursts of dust and smoke in the farming season.
Are air quality levels in Palo Duro Baptist Church based on measurements or forecasts?
It is forecasts derived by downscaling forecasts provided by EU’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) by taking into account local conditions such as traffic patterns. CAMS bases its forecast on satellite measurements of particles and chemical compounds in the atmosphere. Airmine’s services were developed with support from the European Space Agency (ESA)’s Business Applications and Space Solutions (BASS) team.
Why doesn’t the forecast always reflect wildfire impacts?
Airmine’s forecast uses CAMS (Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service) as its background atmospheric model. While CAMS includes wildfire emissions, these are derived from satellite observations and are not available in real time. During rapidly evolving wildfire events, there may therefore be a delay before increased emissions are incorporated into the model. As a result, the forecast may temporarily underestimate PM₂.₅ and other pollutants associated with wildfire smoke.
During rapidly evolving wildfire events, CAMS may lag by approximately 1–2 days before increased wildfire emissions are fully represented, which can lead to temporary underestimation of PM₂.₅ concentrations in Airmine’s forecast.
Understanding the Scale
The 0–100 air quality scores represent risk levels, not direct air pollutant concentrations. Higher scores indicate higher risk.
Air Quality
| Good | 0-20 | Low air quality risk. Air quality is expected to be good, with low levels of pollution. |
| Fair | 20-40 | Generally low air quality risk. Air quality is expected to be acceptable, with some pollution present. |
| Moderate | 40-60 | Moderate air quality risk. Air pollution is elevated and air quality may be less favorable. |
| Poor | 60-80 | High air quality risk. Air pollution is high and air quality is expected to be poor. |
| Very Poor | 80-100 | Very high air quality risk. Air pollution is very high and air quality is expected to be very poor. |