Kabetogama Township Air Quality Forecast - Today, Tomorrow
Air Quality Today
Today (10 October): Air quality in Kabetogama Township is good. AQI, PM2.5, PM10, NO2, O3, SO2, CO, HCHO, and PM1 are good. Pollution peaks around 11:00 AM (O3: 18.5/100).
Air Quality Tomorrow
Tomorrow (11 October 2026): Air quality in Kabetogama Township is fair. AQI worsens to fair; NO2 increases to fair; all other pollutants stay as today. Pollution peaks around 3:00 PM (NO2: 22.4/100).
Explore Forecasts
Pollen & Mold
Air Quality for Neighborhoods
Pollen in Other Cities
Air Quality
Today - 10 October
| Pollutant | Level | Value |
|---|---|---|
| AQI | Good | 18.5/100 |
| PM2.5 (fine particles) | Good | 10.9/100 |
| PM10 (coarse particles) | Good | 13.3/100 |
| NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) | Good | 8.7/100 |
| O3 (ozone) | Good | 18.5/100 |
| SO2 (sulfur dioxide) | Good | 0.3/100 |
| CO (carbon monoxide) | Good | 0.5/100 |
| HCHO (formaldehyde) | Good | 0.8/100 |
| PM1 (ultrafine particles) | Good | 1.6/100 |
Tomorrow - 11 October
| Pollutant | Level | Value |
|---|---|---|
| AQI | Fair | 22.4/100 |
| PM2.5 (fine particles) | Good | 13.5/100 |
| PM10 (coarse particles) | Good | 13.2/100 |
| NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) | Fair | 22.4/100 |
| O3 (ozone) | Good | 18.1/100 |
| SO2 (sulfur dioxide) | Good | 0.5/100 |
| CO (carbon monoxide) | Good | 0.6/100 |
| HCHO (formaldehyde) | Good | 1.4/100 |
| PM1 (ultrafine particles) | Good | 4.1/100 |
Local Environmental Conditions
Around the heart of Kabetogama Township, traffic is light and there are few concentrated sources of air pollution. Open water nearby lets breezes move freely across the area, helping to disperse pollutants. On some days, pollution drifting in from farther away outweighs local sources. Exhaust from nearby roads is usually highest close to busy streets and junctions.
Ozone is the main concern from July to August, when sunny days averaging 20°C turn traffic and other emissions into ozone by mid-afternoon. Later, cold spells from November to April, at around -14°C on average, are when smoke from wood burning and traffic lingers longest. On any given day, wind and rain matter most: breezy or wet weather disperses pollution, while calm, dry spells let it build.
Get pollen & AQ on Strava
Follow your environmental exposure and performance with the free Airmine-Strava integration. See your pollen and air quality exposure for every Strava activity.
Resource Hub
Air quality forecast neighborhoods 16 neighborhoods
Frequently Asked Questions About Air Quality in Minnesota
Is air quality bad in Kabetogama Township right now?
On 10 October 2026, overall air quality in Kabetogama Township is good. AQI is the main air quality indicator at 18.5/100. Pollution peaks around 11:00 AM (O3: 18.5/100).
Will air quality be worse tomorrow in Kabetogama Township?
On 11 October 2026, air quality conditions in Kabetogama Township will be worse than today, with AQI forecast at fair at 22.4/100. Pollution peaks around 3:00 PM (NO2: 22.4/100).
When is air pollution at its worst in Kabetogama Township?
Ozone is the main concern from July to August, when sunny days averaging 20°C turn traffic and other emissions into ozone by mid-afternoon. Later, cold spells from November to April, at around -14°C on average, are when smoke from wood burning and traffic lingers longest. On any given day, wind and rain matter most: breezy or wet weather disperses pollution, while calm, dry spells let it build.
Are air quality levels in Kabetogama Township based on measurements or forecasts?
It is forecasts derived by downscaling forecasts provided by EU’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) by taking into account local conditions such as traffic patterns. CAMS bases its forecast on satellite measurements of particles and chemical compounds in the atmosphere. Airmine’s services were developed with support from the European Space Agency (ESA)’s Business Applications and Space Solutions (BASS) team.
Why doesn’t the forecast always reflect wildfire impacts?
Airmine’s forecast uses CAMS (Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service) as its background atmospheric model. While CAMS includes wildfire emissions, these are derived from satellite observations and are not available in real time. During rapidly evolving wildfire events, there may therefore be a delay before increased emissions are incorporated into the model. As a result, the forecast may temporarily underestimate PM₂.₅ and other pollutants associated with wildfire smoke.
During rapidly evolving wildfire events, CAMS may lag by approximately 1–2 days before increased wildfire emissions are fully represented, which can lead to temporary underestimation of PM₂.₅ concentrations in Airmine’s forecast.
Understanding the Scale
The 0–100 air quality scores represent risk levels, not direct air pollutant concentrations. Higher scores indicate higher risk.
Air Quality
| Good | 0-20 | Low air quality risk. Air quality is expected to be good, with low levels of pollution. |
| Fair | 20-40 | Generally low air quality risk. Air quality is expected to be acceptable, with some pollution present. |
| Moderate | 40-60 | Moderate air quality risk. Air pollution is elevated and air quality may be less favorable. |
| Poor | 60-80 | High air quality risk. Air pollution is high and air quality is expected to be poor. |
| Very Poor | 80-100 | Very high air quality risk. Air pollution is very high and air quality is expected to be very poor. |